Posts Tagged ‘ interview

Interview: Spoiling Heavy Rain with David Cage 19 March 2010 at 12:00 pm by knetelbapz

Once a major release has been completed and propelled to the top of the sales charts, the critical discussion surrounding it typically evaporates just as the Next Big Thing appears on the horizon. But Heavy Rain — whether you like it, love it or loathe it — has been kept afloat in popular opinion, with critics still debating its controversial design and embarrassing themselves as they attempt to shoehorn water puns like “afloat” and “evaporates” into ham-fisted introductory paragraphs.

We drew Heavy Rain’s director and writer, the soft-spoken, passionate and occasionally enigmatic David Cage, into the ongoing discussion and asked him to elaborate upon the game’s story, its technology and its critical reception. Oh, and the nature of the Origami Killer, which means …

SPOILER WARNING: The following interview contains massive, big-huge spoilers for Heavy Rain. If you have not completed Quantic Dream’s cinematic adventure, do not proceed beyond the break — and don’t even think about reading the comments. Just turn around and slowly R2 away.

Continue reading Interview: Spoiling Heavy Rain with David Cage

JoystiqInterview: Spoiling Heavy Rain with David Cage originally appeared on Joystiq on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments


+ Interview: EyePet’s Nicolas Doucet discusses Move integration By Sachqaig 16 March 2010 at 12:00 am and have No Comments

We were starting to worry that SCEA had forgotten about EyePet when its planned holiday 2009 release came and went. Sony’s Eye-enabled virtual pet simulator made a surprising reemergence recently, now featuring PlayStation Move support. We chatted with EyePet producer Nicolas Doucet about implementing Sony’s motion controller into the game, and what that means for gamers, new and old.

By removing the Magic Card, and replacing it with motion controls, isn’t this new version of EyePet, essentially, a brand new game?

Especially for North America and Japan, as well. It’s going to be the first release, so yeah it’s a brand new game. We’ve really made a lot of effort to make sure that whatever we converted from the Magic Card for the Move wasn’t just a port. We deconstructed and reconstructed things to really make it feel like a Move-dedicated game. Obviously, to begin with it wasn’t. We put a lot of effort into that. We’ve extended the development by another nine months to really give something special to players.

Will it be a PlayStation Move launch title?

Yes it will be, this Fall.

Gallery: EyePet (Move)

Continue reading Interview: EyePet’s Nicolas Doucet discusses Move integration

JoystiqInterview: EyePet’s Nicolas Doucet discusses Move integration originally appeared on Joystiq on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments


+ Interview: ModNation Racers’ Dan Sochan By Friedasfan 15 March 2010 at 4:30 pm and have No Comments

ModNation Racers has come a long way since the release of its public beta last year. Since then, Sony San Diego Studios and United Front Games have expanded the franchise quite a bit, adding a number of new creation tools, four-player split-screen support and even a PSP counterpart. We chatted with ModNation Racers producer Dan Sochan about what’s new, and what we can expect from the future, including support for the PlayStation Move motion controller.

Joystiq: What’s new about the code we’re seeing today at GDC?
Dan Sochan, producer, ModNation Racers: There’s the four-player split-screen, two-player online split-screen, and we’ve also announced and have been showing off more of the single player career. We kept the story of the single player career mode quite light. At its core, it’s still a racing game, so we didn’t want to complicate it with you saving the world. The story is you’re this young racer who goes into this league, the ModNation Racing Championship, and you’re basically going from a nobody to take on the ultimate champion. Through the way you have also have a bit of an influence. It has some elements of Pleasantville, where everyone tends to be a little bit more drab with the colors they choose for their characters and karts, and you influence them by being very creative. So all of a sudden everyone wants to have bright, vibrant colors and doing very elaborate decorating of themselves and their karts, and it’s narrated through two characters: Biff and Gary, who offer comic relief through the game.

How does progression work in the single player campaign? Do you unlock creation tools in that mode, akin to LittleBigPlanet?
Yes, definitely there will be a certain number of unlockables you’ll get through the career, but we tried not to make it exclusively through the career. We didn’t want to pigeonhole people and force them to play that way. So you’ll also get more unlocks by publishing, sharing, downloading, voting, basically being a participant in the community, which is kind of cool.

Gallery: ModNation Racers

Continue reading Interview: ModNation Racers’ Dan Sochan

JoystiqInterview: ModNation Racers’ Dan Sochan originally appeared on Joystiq on Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments


+ Interview: Metroid: Other M producer Yoshio Sakamoto By avyapnrty 12 March 2010 at 2:03 pm and have No Comments


After delivering a GDC panel on his cinematic inspiration, we met with Metroid: Other M producer Yoshio Sakamoto to ask him about everything from collaborating with Team Ninja, lessons learned from Metroid Prime, the newfound focus on story in the Metroid universe, and whether or not he played Chair’s Super Metroid love letter, Shadow Complex. Read on!

Can you tell us about the process of working with Team Ninja. Who does what design-wise and technology-wise?

Yoshio Sakamoto: The original design concept came from me, but then we went and assembled a team that could pull this off. And in this case it was people from Team Ninja, who we really thought was the best fit. But they’ve also provided a lot of core ideas that have influenced the direction of the game, particularly the director, Mr. Hayashi. So, as I mentioned in the speech today, it’s not so much that we’re dividing up tasks but collaborating as equals.

After E3 and the initial announcement a lot of people were making comments like, “Oh, it seems like they’ve dumped Retro for this series and they want to go with another developer,” as if it was a big switch-off. But, in actuality, that is far from the case; rather, we just wanted to put together the best team that we could to make this project, which turns out to be Project M.

Gallery: Metroid: Other M

Continue reading Interview: Metroid: Other M producer Yoshio Sakamoto

JoystiqInterview: Metroid: Other M producer Yoshio Sakamoto originally appeared on Joystiq on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:03:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments


+ Interview: Sony’s Scott Rohde on PlayStation Move By HaraDealslove 11 March 2010 at 12:25 pm and have No Comments

Sony Worldwide Studios VP Scott Rohde had the onerous task of introducing the first PlayStation Move games at Sony’s GDC press conference last night. We caught up with the executive after the show to talk about Sony’s plans for exploiting motion control and if hardcore gamers should be concerned about the future of the PS3 games library.

Our complete interview with Rohde follows:

It’s obviously going to take internal resources to develop games for PlayStation Move. How can you guarantee that this won’t take away from the resources devoted to traditional hardcore games?

Scott Rohde: The bottom line is, you know Worldwide Studios is a huge organization. I’m not sure exactly where it sits among other global publishers, but it’s right up there. There’s a lot of resources put into product development. I’m pretty proud of the roll that we’ve been on — with Uncharted 2 kind of sweeping the awards recently.

There’s plenty of resources to go around. It’s our heritage: we’re never going to compromise our core; great exclusive games. This is a new initiative to us. Some teams are looking into how they might incorporate motion control into some existing plans; others are totally focused on making the best sequels to the games we all love. It’s not something I’m worried about.

Continue reading Interview: Sony’s Scott Rohde on PlayStation Move

JoystiqInterview: Sony’s Scott Rohde on PlayStation Move originally appeared on Joystiq on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments


+ Facebook: Beyond the notifications By CoastCoktiete 03 March 2010 at 6:00 am and have No Comments

Facebook: Beyond the notifications screenshot

As social games become more and more accepted, and the base continues to grow and grow, I decided it was time to start asking some Facebook developers about the platform. This is the first article in a weeklong series that examines multiple angles: the division between social and hardcore, big publisher invasion, the necessity of notifications, and social games’ future. This article is about notifications. In my question, I called that tactic “invasive.” The responses react to that word.

Just like that, the notifications stopped. On March 1st, 10AM Pacific Time, Facebook removed the ability for application developers to send notifications to its users, ending the virtual logjam in that respective inbox.

The clot has not been removed. Rather, it’s been thrust off the social platform to another location: users’ e-mail. Developers must now send messages to personal digital mail. Most apps are asking for that address now, others will no doubt require it in the near future.

Social games are often knocked for their ceaseless updates. But there is a reason developers used, and sometimes abused, notifications.

Why? Notifications are part of the culture of Facebook. And some people liked the barrage — it kept them connected and learning about new wares.

Word-of-mouth, critical reception, and marketing doesn’t have the pull on Facebook like it does in our little slice of the world.

“People have the option to publish their status or not and we like to leave it to players to decide,” Bill Mooney, VP and GM, FarmVille at Zynga Games tells me via e-mail, the next target of possible FarmVille messaging.

“That said,” he continues, “messages between users and networks are a huge part of the Facebook model and many people appreciate the level of communication offered.

“Eventually, I think Facebook will become more personalized — publishing feeds only to people who may or may not be interested in a certain topic. There is a dichotomy — many game users love the messages, which people who don’t play want to see fewer game communications. We’re also moving to provide more communication in-game.”

At least one developer did see standard notifications as a problem — a bad mark on a platform that is still learning what it can do with its 350 million members. In a sense, the spam was evidence of its immaturity.

“Much of the current intrusiveness of these games shouldn’t be necessary if the game experience is at its core fun and socially engaging,” PopCap Games Bejeweled Blitz co-designers John Vechey and Jon “JD” David tell me via e-mail.

“We try to err on the side of minimalism in this respect; Bejeweled Blitz does very, very little in the way of automatically generated messages among players. Almost all such communications are opt-in choices made by the player, and we believe that if the game in question is good enough, players will want to share parts of that game experience often enough that the game can both grow organically and be non-intrusive in the eyes of all but the most curmudgeonly social network users.”

When the switch is flipped two things seem possible: we’ll get less notifications, and some developers will hurt for it.

“Some games,” 3G Studios James Kosta tells me, “and here’s where I ding Zynga, have taken intrusiveness to a whole other level. Facebook will have to implement new features and policies and every developer will suffer. In order to make money, apps need to be as intrusive as the user is comfortable with it.

I interviewed these three developers before it was widely known that Facebook was set to turn off notifications. And it looks like what Kosta supposed came true: this is certainly a policy switch.

But is it a fruitful one for everyone?

Source 1 [Facebook]

Source 2 [Mashable] [image]


Photo


Photo

+ The convergent futures of music games and higher education By lillinhaste 02 March 2010 at 9:30 am and have No Comments

The convergent futures of music games and higher education screenshot

You know what makes a lot of money? Music games. Even in 2009, a year in which music games saw a 46% drop in sales from 2008, DJ Hero became the highest-grossing new IP across all genres. It’s a game that was being called a failure in the weeks after its release, and some today even suggest that its sales have been modest. Yet for the companies that make music games, the cash continues to roll in.

The obvious question is “Where do music games go from here?”

To get an answer, I went to an expert on the subject: NYU professor Samuel Howard-Spink, who is heading up an initiative called the NYU Music Video Games Research Project. We had the opportunity to chat about nearly everything about music games, including the future of peripheral-based games, titles like Rez and PaRappa the Rapper, and a Guitar Hero/Rock Band battle to the death. 

So, what is the NYU Music Video Games Research Project? “The NYU-MVGRP,” Howard-Spink says, “was started as a way of getting the word out around the university and further afield that the convergence of music and gaming deserves closer attention. I began working in NYU’s Music Business Program in 2007, and came in excited about the opportunities gaming and mobile apps offer music creators and publishers. There are a handful of gaming related initiatives around NYU dealing with interactive design and esthetics, or gaming and learning, but nothing dedicated to the convergence of musical and gaming cultures and businesses.”

“Once I started, it I began to get attention from a variety of places, mainly professors whose students are asking for more classes dealing with these emerging opportunities. In the past semester a group of undergrads has formed the NYU Game Audio and Music Association (NGAMA) and they are now driving student activities. My own department, Music and Performance Arts Professions in the Steinhardt School, is developing game-related courses in its music business, music technology, and film composition programs. It’s very early days but my great hope is for our graduates to be leaders the field.”

I’m sure you’re all thinking about clicking that “new tab” button and sending in an application to NYU, but stick with me here. I asked Professor Howard-Spink what, exactly, these groups hope to find, both in terms of the oft-discussed monetary side, and also in terms of the cultural importance of these plastic-instrument games.

“It is rapidly becoming the case that there aren’t really pure music “consumers” anymore, in the way that we were at some point all consumers of pieces of plastic embedded with a recording, or as radio listeners where we consumed music in exchange for our attention to be sold to advertisers. People who value music in 2010 are “users” much more than they are consumers. In fact a recent survey shows that American kids spend 7.5 hours a day multitasking with media, most of which integrates music of some kind.”

“So I don’t see games as having the power to completely change music purchasing, rather they will expand economic opportunities for music creators and fans in ways we’re just beginning to understand. Games are already expanding the variety of music people are exposed to and are therefore likely to want to purchase and own, as well as the places and circumstances under which this mutual reinforcement takes place.”

When a JRPG leads me to purchase hours upon hours of Romantic piano, it’s hard to argue with Professor Howard-Spink on this point. Indeed, I know that I have personally expanded the types of music that I listen to based solely on games that have music in them: not only music games. But if consumers are being introduced to so much new music, why are CD sales still down?

“On the supply side, games and interactive media in general are definitely increasing the opportunities for music creators to make their livings licensing works to developers. Everyone knows CD sales are down from their historic peak around 2000, but what is often forgotten is that music publishing revenues and distributions to composers and songwriters are up everywhere because of all the new ways music is used and paid for in new media. Music is more important and enjoyed by more people than ever before, but the CD is not, and they’re not the same thing. The recording business will always stick around, it will just be less dominant vis-à-vis other music economies.”

I also wanted to know about this idea of the cultural importance of music games. Just how closely tied are games and culture, and how does music fit into all of this?

“Videogames and music have always had a close relationship, in much the same way cinema and music have. In both of these entertainment forms the visual elements tend to overwhelm the musical, but as a game like Guitar Hero shows, this is not always a given. Original scores and compositions for major games are decent sellers in their own right, and performances such as Video Games Live are driving teenage boys to sell out orchestral concerts. Games that base their play mechanics on music per se are more rare, but anyone who has played PaRappa the Rapper or Rez understands the attraction. I think Chime is a beautiful example of this, and at the same time it’s pioneering socially conscious gaming.”

“As for licensed soundtracks, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City broke the mold on integrating popular music into the gaming experience, along with the big sports and x-games sims. The “rhythm-action” genre represented by Guitar Hero and Rock Band has been as culturally significant as they have been commercial successes: Guitar Hero 3 was the first game to generate $1b in sales revenues, and in my humble opinion the genre itself has helped to save rock’n’roll from being fully Nickelbacked or Maroon 5-ed into a coma. The games have certainly increased the number of young people interested in pursuing musical activities in many ways; just ask any guitar instructor or owner of a musical instrument store. And when South Park bases an entire episode on Guitar Hero, it’s clear we are dealing with a genuine pop culture phenomenon.

When it comes to the cultural significance of music games, I was also interested in getting an educator’s opinion on the use of music games in education, both in terms of getting students interested in learning an instrument, and the possibility that music games can lead to a deeper understanding and appreciation of music history.

“While there are now many studies showing links between gaming and learning — for kids and adults — to date there have not been many rigorous examinations of their relationship to music education, although there is plenty of anecdotal evidence of their mutual reinforcement. Remember that musical training isn’t solely about scales and correct finger placement; rhythm, song structure, key changes, lyrics, genre styles, etc. are all elements of a musical education, and playing along with songs on Rock Band absolutely aids in the development of the awareness of these elements.”

“Of course, this just happens to be what we have at our disposal today. If you look at the YouRock Guitar, which has strings and is also designed for play with Guitar Hero and Rock Band, you can see the outline of a possible future for music gaming that places greater emphasis on musicianship.”

There was plenty to ask about DJ Hero, as well. Now that we’ve passed over into 2010, it’s hard to get a straight answer about just how well the game did. Activision says that it was the highest-grossing new IP in 2010, yet others suggest that it didn’t sell very well. So, what’s the deal?

DJ Hero is a fascinating case study, and a genuinely innovative game. It was framed as a “failure” when it didn’t meet Guitar Hero-level sales in its first couple of months on the market, which just goes to show how narrowly success is defined by industry “analysts.” Consider this: in January Activision put out a press release saying that DJ Hero was “the highest grossing new IP (intellectual property) in 2009 in the US and Europe.” The release didn’t provide a hard number, so there are a couple of ways to look at this. Either DJ Hero has been much more successful than was suggested by its early sales figures, or so little new IP is produced these days (compared to the recycling of pre-existing IPs) that a relative low-seller like DJ Hero can claim that title.”

“Other factors to consider are that every kid in every part of America knows how to swing a guitar around rock-star style, but DJ-ing and turntablism are strictly speaking urban forms that have less universal appeal. Plus of course the game was released into a truly awful economic and consumer spending environment with a high price tag. I’m encouraged that Activision has already announced DJ Hero 2 for this year.”

I think we can all agree, at the very least, the DJ Hero is a breath of fresh air in a sector of the industry that is, at this point, largely doing the same thing over and over again. One could argue that consumers agree, as sales of The Beatles: Rock Band weren’t particularly amazing. Professor Howard-Spink had some thoughts about the potential stagnancy of music games.

“The genre has lost its early “wow” factor, but I see many reasons to be optimistic. The fact that $60 GH expansion packs are not selling as well as the original titles does not mean the music game is dead, it means the players of these games are making more careful decisions about what they buy.”

“And they are buying, especially DLC tracks, packs and albums, some 60m to Rock Band alone according to Harmonix. They don’t all need brand new plastic instruments to play now, so of course overall revenues from the games are going to be down. I think there may be some legs in band-specific releases depending on the acts. For example, if Jimmy Page ever comes around on this issue, I’m pretty sure a Led Zepellin Guitar Hero would blow away The Beatles: Rock Band in terms of sales.”

“The true innovation in the music game space is Harmonix’s Rock Band Network. In fact, Rock Band in general has pursued a much more sustainable “platform” model than Activision’s major releases every few months. Activision has acknowledged that it saturated the market in 2009 with six separate GH-branded releases, and in 2010 is restricting itself to Guitar Hero 6 and DJ Hero 2. Writing off music games at this point is not dissimilar to the “set-‘em-up and knock-‘em-down” mentality characteristic of the pop music world.”

Ah, yes, Rock Band Network. Professional song-creation tools for bands and artists, a new way to distribute for smaller acts, and the potential for limitless expansion of the Rock Band platform. As a concept, it sounds amazing. But will it work?

“The democratization of access to Rock Band’s distribution platform is highly significant, much more so than the lower sales of new Guitar Hero full-game releases. I’m not convinced that Rock Band Network will be a raging success out of the gate, but over time I expect it to become a very important sales and promotion outlet for indie musicians and bands.”

“At Midem in January, a Harmonix exec told label heads that it was a “no-brainer” to release a DLC version of any new album they’re putting out to capture that group of eager fans. Networked information economic models undermine the rationale for all-or-nothing hit-seeking and million-sellers, and expand opportunities for new entrants. This is a huge opportunity for indie labels and acts and will live or die according to their enthusiasm, whereas the major labels (with the notable exception of Warner Music Group) prefer the hit-based Activision model and hence we get Guitar Hero: Green Day.”

“It’s good for every stakeholder in this field that there is some healthy competition between the two formats that goes beyond dueling tracklists.”

Personally, my main concern with the growth of peripheral-based rhythm games is that we’ll begin to see fewer and fewer non-peripheral music games, such as Amplitude, PaRappa the Rapper, and even games like Audiosurf. Even the PSP release Rock Band: Unplugged arrived to little fanfare. Is there still room for such games in an industry so focused on high-profile, peripheral-based releases?

“Certainly,” Professor Howard-Spink says in response to this question. “With the ways that gaming is growing, especially in mobile applications, I’m pretty sure that we’ve only scratched the surface in terms of the ways that music and games are going to hybridize. Word is that it’s the gaming and music businesses [that are] most bullish on the iPad.”

“Besides, innovation without the addition of new peripherals within existing games is still possible. You can see this is the ways that Harmonix and Activision have added new functionalities to their existing hardware, for example the inclusion of extra notes during a long sustain, or the open E string on the bass. The Beatles game took one controller and managed to turn it into three-part harmonies – that’s an amazing innovation that doesn’t hugely expand the number or type of peripherals needed.”

Then there’s a whole separate sector of music that deserves attention: the fantastic compositions featured in games, both modern and retro. How many readers of this site, for instance, have game music loaded onto their iPods? How many videogame composers appear in the top ten of our Last.fm pages? Professor Howard-Spink discussed this with me as well.

“As a researcher and teacher in this area, I find it useful to break down music and gaming into four (sometimes overlapping) categories: the original soundtrack, the licensed soundtrack, rhythm-action, and emergent or generative (in which the actions of the player determine the music generated, as in Rez, Lumines or Chime). As far as orchestral OSTs go my recent favorites have included Dead Space, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Assassin’s Creed 2 and BioShock, which has what I consider to be the best sound design and musical integration of any game in the past five years.”

“Licensed soundtracks I’ve enjoyed include GTA4 – 18 radio stations and 200 hours of material is simply amazing – and the Rockabilly tracks from WET. BioShock 2’s licensed soundtrack does an amazing job of using songs from the 1930s and ‘40s to creep the hell out of me. And I bought a London Symphony Orchestra recording of Beethoven’s Ode To Joy after playing nothing but Peggle for two weeks straight last year.”

Then, just to throw some fuel on a fire that still rages, I had to ask: Rock Band or Guitar Hero?

“As a gamer, I prefer Guitar Hero because it’s geared more towards high-speed shredding and employs all the little reward mechanisms that keep a gamer coming back: incremental improvements in scores, note streaks and percentage breakdowns, for example. I prefer the hardware too, the smaller buttons allow for more speed than the fatter ones on Rock Band, plus I like the click in the strum bar. Rock Band is the better product from a musical and social gaming perspective.”

This seems to disagree with a lot of people recently, who have come to loathe both Activision and the Guitar Hero franchise, especially after the recent closure of Red Octane, the publisher of the original Guitar Hero.

“It’s a little too easy to frame Activision as the corporate baddie and Harmonix as the scrappy indie that could once you remember that it’s owned by Viacom. Last year I think I played Guitar Hero: Metallica more than any other game — I’d never even liked Metallica until I played it (Lars and Napster, long story), and the tracks from supporting acts are outstanding — and now I listen to and buy a lot more thrash and death metal than I did a couple of years ago.”

And will there be an eventual winner in this war?

“If I had to make a bet, I think that in the medium to long term the Rock Band platform will win out over Activision’s half-dozen disc releases a year.”

If all of this talk about games, music, and learnin’ has you interested, you can learn more about NYU’s games-related offerings at the NYU Game Center and the NYU Music Video Games Research Project blog.


Photo


Photo


Photo


Photo


Photo


Photo


Photo

+ Facebook: publishers pushing boundaries By avhrevenue 02 March 2010 at 6:00 am and have No Comments

Facebook: publishers pushing boundaries screenshot

As social games become more and more accepted, and the base continues to grow and grow, I decided it was time to start asking some Facebook developers about the platform. This is the first article in a weeklong series that examines multiple angles: the division between social and hardcore, big publisher invasion, the necessity of notifications, and social games’ future.

A studio or a publisher, much like a writer, needs to ask an important question when starting work on an empty slate: who is the intended audience?

Another chin-scratcher to consider is platform. Does this pedestal, console, or blog seem like a good place to deliver to the intended audience?

Publishers are eager to jump into the Facebook pool, which might or might not have its fair share of turds floating around. But one thing is certain: its water is green with cash and it’s filled with users.

Earlier last year Electronic Arts made big waves by acquiring Playfish, a dedicated Facebook developer, for 300 million dollars. It signaled that the publisher was serious about the platform and perhaps not so concerned with shovelware of the Dante’s Inferno social Web game variety.

In 2009 we also saw Ubisoft release its first Facebook game, a traditional social Web game called TickTock. Hallow like the “o” in boring, it didn’t dazzle. But it showed that the publisher was serious about the platform in some regard.

Earlier this week I discussed the divide between social Web games and “core” games like Heavy Rain. There’s another, much smaller gap present. It’s between developers who are familiar with the social games versus those who aren’t — EA vs. Zynga, Ubisoft vs. 3G Studios.

Here’s a fundamental question I had when thinking about this topic: is big publisher targeting of the platform a good thing?

“Absolutely,” Zynga’s FarmVille VP and GM Bill Mooney tells me, “the more traditional publishers enter the market of social gaming, the more the segment will grow. More companies and games, means more choices there will be to suit the varied tastes of consumers worldwide. 

“That said, we feel very good about companies already in the social games space — our talent, some of which comes from traditional games, compares favorably.”

Nintendo must feel the same way about their position with the Wii. The publisher’s games are perfectly suited for the platform. It’s odd to consider that Nintendo competes against third-party studios on its platform, but it does. And it often wins.

“With a nascent market sector, participation of the industry’s biggest companies is generally a good thing in terms of legitimizing the space and pushing its boundaries,” PopCap duo, John Vechey and Jon ‘JD’ David, two co-creators of Facebook App Bejeweled Blitz tell me via e-mail.

“Look at casual games; the arrival of Nintendo’s Wii and the efforts by EA and other big publishers increased awareness of the casual sector tremendously, without wiping out the smaller firms that make up the majority of the casual games market.

“But just as with the casual sector, large traditional publishers need to understand the space and conform their offerings accordingly, rather than trying to make the space conform to their offerings. So while you’ll probably never play Madden directly on Facebook the way you might play a head-to-head match on PC or console, a ‘general manager’-level mode or Madden-based fantasy league might do very well on social networks and in fact introduce a large new audience to what has traditionally been a very ‘core’ sports sim.”

An understanding of the audience and platform is as critical as developing a good game. Bigger, traditional publishers just breaking in to Facebook might not get it all down pat immediately. Growing pains.

 ”Like I said,” 3G Studio’s CEO Costa says to me, “the general public gets it so all you should have to do it dumb down your franchises a bit and you’re good to go, right? Wrong!”

“The catch is that the general public is used to not paying for entertainment. If you’re a product person and don’t understand service-based business models you’re sunk in this market. There are Web and Media companies that will eat your lunch because, again, the game is the easy part.”

“EA made an interesting move buying Playfish and I’m eager to see if the box-product and service-oriented cultures can be merged. Most publishers will just integrate Facebook feeds into their products and move on while companies like Zynga and Playdom that can monetize ‘free’ services will thrive. Wal-mart gets a lot of foot traffic and they spend millions analyzing it and driving shoppers through the store like cattle. If you’re a developer ready to jump in and you don’t understand traffic monetization, then ‘Here be monsters.’ “

It’s a give and take mentality, coupled with a deep knowledge of the platform and its audience that has allowed some companies to thrive via Facebook.

One could argue that its games are simple because of the tech. Turns out it’s the people who are keeping the tech in line.

“The social web is still in its infancy and will continue to develop and evolve over the next several years. Zynga is and always will be focused on developing fun, engaging games,” Zynga’s Mooney told me.”

“While Zynga games offer a very social experience already, social gaming needs to be more about real user interaction and communication inside the game. One of the challenges in FarmVille is in-game communication — but people talk about it at bars, in dorms, on Facebook, and everywhere else.  We will be implementing new features that encourage more in-game communication this year.

“Ultimately, the most exciting and challenging thing that social games are a new kind of game – we know that the social experience fundamentally changes how gamers behave and everyone is still figuring out what provides the best experience for our audience.”

“Developing for the general public is just a different beast altogether,” 3G’s Costa said in our e-mail interview. “It takes a Web 2.0 mentality and your whole dev-team has to be onboard. Mark Pinkus, the founder of Zynga has said it best: Plan to one hundred percent, execute to forty percent. Deploy, measure, adjust, repeat. Zynga analyzes metrics, adjusts their games and redeploys in hours, not years.”

But some developers haven’t hit a wall. In fact, the platform has provided an outlet to do something new and unique for PopCap.

“The one thing that’s historically been lacking from our games is multiplayer, and Facebook gives us a fantastic environment in which to add multiplayer elements — some social, some competitive, some a combination of both — to games that we believe people have always wanted to play with others but just haven’t been able to in the past,” the PopCap duo told me.

Facebook isn’t going anywhere, and more users are playing FarmVille right now than there are members of Twitter. We’re not eager to see the stumbles, but we are excited to see the results of the successes.

+ Facebook Games: Bigger is not better By Halegretavi 01 March 2010 at 6:30 am and have No Comments

Facebook Games: Bigger is not better screenshot

As social games become more and more accepted, and the base continues to grow and grow, I decided it was time to start asking some Facebook developers about the platform. This is the first article in a weeklong series that examines multiple angles: the division between social and hardcore, big publisher invasion, the necessity of notifications, and social games’ future. 

Like it or not, social Web games are shaping the industry, making it possible for older and younger folks to get involved in a pastime that is often described as difficult or convoluted by those not intimately familiar with it.

It’s all in the Apps. Embeddable, simple, intuitive little pieces of software that have the power of capturing the imagination of those turned off by complicated HUDs and dramatic, battle-worn vistas or sludgy caverns full of monsters.

A monster in its own right is Facebook, a real-time LiveJournal that allows its users to connect and share on the fly, much like how Twitter allows us to talk about what our farts smell like the instant we catch a foul scent in the air.

Facebook is the bleeding edge of the social Web game revolution — one that many “core” gamers aren’t fond of. Chalk it up to the alien feel of Apps and their relative simplicity in comparison to the software being distributed on the Xbox 360 or PlayStation3.

In other words, the cons are the exact opposite of what others have found themselves enjoying about social games.

There is a divide between the two realms. On one end, there’s the social Web game. On the other, there’s the hardcore game. They’re both entertaining, and the beautiful thing is that they both offer unique experiences. The essence of social games for Zynga Games, developer of FarmVille and Mafia Wars, has something to do with the fact that it isn’t confined to the “core” approach.

“Social games are extremely different from hardcore games — so it’s like comparing apples and oranges — they both offer players different experiences and entertainment values,” FarmVille VP and GM Bill Mooney told me via e-mail. 

“Facebook game graphics can’t compare to those made for traditional consoles like PlayStation or Xbox, but they will continue to evolve and become more social and engaging. That said, we see users who were never gamers getting ’sucked’ into core gamer experiences — it’s very cool to hear about a 50-year-old person who clans up in Mafia Wars or min-maxes their crop production in FarmVille.”

PopCap Games, makers of Plants vs. Zombies, share the same idea as Zynga Games — with an added twist that represents how just how the studio has tackled the platform with Bejeweled Blitz.

“The Bejeweled Blitz experience is quite different from a ‘hardcore’ game obviously — it’s intended to be consumed in much smaller sessions (five minutes here, ten minutes there, when your schedule allows) … and for the Facebook audience as a whole, this seems very appropriate,” a PopCap Games duo, John Vechey and Jon ‘JD’ David, told me over e-mail. 

“Social games are a different breed from core games, and it’s doubtful that they’ll ever reach the levels of sophistication of core games, for a wide variety of reasons.”

This divide, which separates the gen pop from the hardcore like a prison’s wrought-iron gates and plastic shields, wasn’t made by the “core” crowd. It’s as simple as these two types of games offering their users two different experiences.

But I’ve learned from playing games like Bejeweled Blitz that fun is fun. And fun is universal. Just ask a Mt. Dew-infused teen how he feels about Halo, and then bother a 50-something woman about her thoughts on FarmVille. Beyond the curses from both parties, you’ll hear the same thing: “I like this because it’s fun.” This is the same concept espoused by James Costa, CEO of 3G Studios.

His studio’s upcoming Facebook game, Brave Arms, is set to toe the line of Facebook App and traditional console software. It’s an FPS, and one that may surprise you.

“For years game companies have been convincing us that bigger is better,” Costa told me via e-mail. “It’s like the movie industry ten years ago: everything had to be a blockbuster. In reality, we watch blockbusters a few times a month, TV shows almost daily and YouTube videos several times a day.

“Most of us at 3G are ‘core’ gamers and ‘core’ gamers see ourselves as connoisseurs of ‘great’ games, but that elitist mentality is what’s causing AAA-studios to close down and indie developers to flourish.

” ‘Core’ games are a niche market and at 30-million bucks a pop, studios only get one shot to develop an audience. Is Mass Effect 2 fun? Absolutely! Does a game have to be Mass Effect 2 in order to be fun? No way. The general public gets it.”

+ Exclusive Q&A: Front Mission Evolved By John.Laush 28 February 2010 at 8:30 am and have No Comments

Exclusive Q&A: Front Mission Evolved screenshot

As any fan knows it’s been quite a while since any game in the Front Mission franchise landed on English-speaking shores. So long, in fact that a few dedicated gamers went and did it themselves.

Now, the series is set for a return, albeit in a decidedly different form, as Front Mission Evolved is more of 3rd-person action game than a turn-based strategy title. Old fans and new players alike simply must know more about this latest, current-generation installment.

To that end we sent Square Enix a bunch of questions, and got a bunch of answers. Read on for Destructoid’s exclusive Front Mission Evolved Q&A with Square Enix producer Shinji Hashimoto. You can also check the gallery for some hot new screens they sent just for you!

Destructoid: Front Mission Evolved is certainly a departure from the previous games, which were turn-based titles. What was the creative drive behind the change of style?

Shinji Hashimoto: The genre for previous numbered Front Mission titles that we’ve released was turn-based strategy games.  There were several spin-off titles, which were real-time simulations and side-scrollers, but I believe users have developed a strong recognition that Front Mission is a turn-based strategy game.

We feel that there are a lot of opportunities with the change of style because controlling the Wanzers seemed to have great compatibility with the shooter genre, making it a natural choice for this title.

Among its fans, the Front Mission series is known for having a very dense, involved backstory. Where does Front Mission Evolved stand in that canon? Will the game’s story be making any references to previous (or future) events?

This title is set farther in the future than any other game in the series. In 2171 AD, the human race, seeking supremacy on Earth, began to reach for the stars, racing to build orbital elevators.
Although it shares a common plot with the series, the story is not directly related to the previous renditions.  Anyone playing this series for the first time will be able to enjoy it.

The game apparently offers on-foot action alongside the Wanzer-piloting. Just how much can the player do when he’s outside his Wanzer? Will he be able to get in and out of it at will? Can he hijack other Wanzers?

During the single player mode, there are several missions in which the player character will exit the Wanzer to explore surrounding buildings and areas. Due to the map design and story, however, the player cannot get in and out of the Wanzer nor hijack other Wanzers at will. The third-person action as the pilot is exciting for any shooter fan, though.

One of the conflicts that came out of the original design concept was balancing the flow of the game and difficulty. It is difficult to keep consistency in the story when you can leave your Wanzer at a moment’s notice, while at the same time possibly creating impossible situations if, say, you were to lose your Wanzer in a boss fight because you decided to jump out. Additionally, retaining the graphical scale of both “worlds” – on-foot action and battles with huge mechs – would have been very difficult. We decided on a design that allowed both game types to be optimized graphically without sacrificing the fidelity of the game’s next-gen aesthetic.

Will there be a strategic or tactical element in Front Mission Evolved’s gameplay? Will the player be able to control a squad or be part of a larger operation?

The players will be able to enjoy tactical battles in the online multiplayer mode, where players can customize the allocation of roles such as snipers, assaults, and medics in each team. We’ll be sharing more information on multiplayer in the future.

Front Mission games have traditionally featured a fair amount of customization, with players able to choose from a variety of weapons and body parts to use in combat. Will Front Mission Evolved also have this sort of feature?

Yes, there’s an incredible amount of customization elements you can look forward to!  The title offers a variety of stages, as well as vast choices to customize your Wanzers for the online PtoP mode to fully express your unique designs.  I’m excited to see all of your Wanzers!

—-

That concludes our exclusive Q&A with Square Enix’s Shinji Hashimoto. We would like to thank him for his time. I for one am quite excited, and can’t wait until new gamers get to know just what a “Pile Bunker” is when related to robot weaponry. 

Front Mission Evolved is in development for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, and is due for a Spring 2010 release.

 


Photo


Photo


Photo


Photo


google

google

asus